خاتم النبيين. العقيدة

however, there is no relevant archaeological, epigraphic, or numismatic evidence dating from the time of Muhammad, nor are there any references to him in non-Muslim sources dating from the period before 632 5, "One major challenge to examining initial contacts between Byzantium and the early Muslim umma arises from the controversy surrounding the traditional Islamic account
Seeing Islam as others saw it: a survey and evaluation of Christian, Jewish, Robert G The Bustan al-Ukul, by Nathanael ibn al-Fayyumi, edited and translated by David Levine, Columbia University Oriental Studies Vol

دانشگاه خاتم النبین(ص)

Ideally, one would like to be able to check such accounts against contemporary evidence.

28
محمد (ص)خاتِم النبيين وخاتَمهم
sources are not contemporaneous with the events they purport to relate and sometimes were written many centuries later
قولوا: خاتم النبيين ولا تقولوا لا نبي بعده
Hitti, History of the Arabs, 10th edition 1970 , p
خاتم النبيين ورسالته الخالدة

محمد

137 Netanel's work was virtually unknown beyond his native Yemen until modern times, so had little influence on later Jewish thought• See, for example, Bowersock, Glen Warren, Peter Robert Lamont Brown and Oleg Grabar Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World 1999, Harvard University Press p.

دانشگاه خاتم النبین(ص)
These sources contain internal complexities, anachronisms, discrepancies, and contradictions
العقيدة
Lapidus 2002 , pp 0
محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم هو خاتم الأنبياء والرسل
El-Cheikh, Nadia Maria Byzantium Viewed by the Arabs 2004, Harvard University Press p Denis Gril, Miracles, , Brill, 2007
"Muhmmad," Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim world• Moreover, many of them provide evidence of embellishment and invention that were introduced to serve the purposes of political or religious apologetic

خاتم النبيين وخاتم الائمة ؟!!!!!!

Peter Teed 1992 , p.

18
محمد (ص)خاتِم النبيين وخاتَمهم
محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم خاتم النبيين
Kafih Jerusalem, 1984 , ch
محمد (ص)خاتِم النبيين وخاتَمهم
597, which notes that many of the details surrounding Muhammad's life as given in the biographies, are "problematic in certain respects, the most important of which is that they represent a tradition of living narrative that is likely to have developed orally for a considerable period before it was given even a relatively fixed written form